Effects of pemf on benign prostate hyperplasia

Benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) has been treated with various types of electromagnetic radiation methods such as trans urethral needle ablation(TUNA), interstitial laser therapy (ILC), holmium laser resection (HoLRP). In the present study, the effects of a noninvasive method based on the exposure of patients with BPH to a pulsative EM Field at radiofrequencies have been investigated…..

There was also a remarkable improvement in symptoms of BPH in the patients of the EG. The PEMFs-treated group was restudied with IPSS score and U/S of prostate, and they all maintained the scores achieved after EMFs treatment. In contrast, all patients treated with a-blockers were submitted to prostatectomy within 30 days after a four-week treatment with a-blockers because of deterioration of their symptoms and no alteration in prostate volume. All patients of the TG were subjected to prostatectomy within 30 days after the end of the study in contrast to none of the EG patients, who remained clinically improved and almost free of symptoms for more than a year after exposure to the above pulsed electromagnetic field.

In the present study, the effects of a pulsed electromagnetic field on patients suffering from benign prostate hyperplasia are reported. According to our results, patients exposed to the pulsed Table 2 Electromagnetic group (N=10) Before After PPSA (ng/ml)0.7±0.2 0.6±0.2=0.7 IPSS 20±214±3\0.02 U/S prostate volume (cm3) 33±530±2\0.04 U/S urine residue (cm3) 100±4070±25\0.03 Mean urine flow rate (ml/sec)8±0.5 11±0.2\0.001 PSA Prostate-specific antigen, IPSS, The International Prostate Symptom Score,U/S ultrasound Fig. 1U/S (ultrasound) of prostate in a patient belonging to electromagnetic group (EG) before and after the EMF streatment Fig. 2 Urodynamic test in a patient of the electromagnetic group (EG) before and after the EMFs treatment Int Urol Nephrol 123 electromagnetic field at radio frequencies manifested a significant improvement of prostate hyperplasia symptoms as determined by the IPSS, as well as a statistically significant reduction in prostate volume, urine residue volume, and significant improvement in mean urine flow rate, compared with the TG patients treated with a-blockers (P\0.05). Furthermore, all patients treated with the electromagnetic field remained improved for more than one year in contrast to the patients treated with a-blocker, who subjected to prostatectomy within one month after treatment.

For more of the detailed research performed please click the link below….https://pemfinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/005_PROSTATE_Effects_of_PEMF_on_benign-prostate.pdf